Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 05:00
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
At what point did you realize it was the right time to leave your job?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump’s Truth Social files with SEC for bitcoin-ether ETF - The Block
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
If You Fit Into One Of These 6 Categories, You Should Be Taking Creatine - MindBodyGreen
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Will Boyington – New AA NASA Office Of Communications - NASA Watch
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
2025 Stanley Cup Finals Preview: Can Connor McDavid Finally Do It? - The Ringer
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Did Leonardo da Vinci paint two Mona Lisas? Where are they?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.